Eps 22: We're our ancestors smarter than us
— THE JOKE
The podcast explores whether our ancestors were actually smarter than us or not. The host points out that even though we have advanced technology, it does not necessarily mean that we are smarter than our ancestors. Our ancestors had to survive without technology and had a deep understanding of the natural world around them. However, as our society has developed, we have lost some of the knowledge and skills that our ancestors possessed. The podcast suggests that it is important to acknowledge the intelligence of our ancestors and learn from their expertise. Overall, the podcast highlights the different definitions of intelligence and the importance of recognizing the unique abilities of our ancestors.
| Seed data: | Link 1 |
|---|---|
| Host image: | StyleGAN neural net |
| Content creation: | GPT-3.5, |
Host
Leon Knight
Podcast Content
Hello and welcome to our podcast today, titled "We're our ancestors smarter than us." In this episode, we will explore the fascinating question of whether or not humans today are inferior or superior to our forebears in terms of intelligence, creativity, and innovation.
To start with, let's clarify what we mean by "ancestors" and "smarter." When we say ancestors, we refer to any human beings who lived in the past, from the earliest Homo sapiens who emerged about 300,000 years ago to the recent generations of our great-grandparents. When we say smarter, we mean the holistic and comparative ability of humans to adapt, learn, understand, and manipulate the natural and social environment.
So, were our ancestors smarter than us? This is not a simple yes or no question, as it depends on many factors and perspectives. Here are some arguments for and against the claim.
On the one hand, some people argue that our ancestors were much smarter than us, especially in areas that relied heavily on survival skills, such as hunting, gathering, farming, and building. Our prehistoric ancestors had to rely on their senses, intuition, and experience to hunt animals for food, find edible plants, and build shelters from natural materials. They also had to navigate through unfamiliar terrains, communicate with different tribes, and cope with various climates and disasters. These challenges required a high degree of cognitive and practical intelligence, which our modern societies have largely lost or replaced with technology and expertise. For example, a human in the Stone Age might have been able to survive an encounter with a wild animal through sheer physical agility, while a human in the 21st century might have to rely on a smartphone app to avoid traffic jams.
Another argument for the superiority of our ancestors is their longevity and diversity. Humans have survived and thrived on Earth for hundreds of thousands of years, adapting to diverse ecosystems and changing environments. Our ancestors have developed numerous cultural and linguistic traditions, including music, dance, mythology, philosophy, and art, that reflect their creativity, curiosity, and imagination. Our current lifestyles, on the other hand, are often criticized for their monotony, homogeneity, and artificiality. We spend most of our time indoors, staring at screens, consuming mass-produced goods and services, and losing touch with nature and other humans.
On the other hand, some people argue that our ancestors were not necessarily smarter than us, but simply had different challenges and opportunities. They point out that humans today inherit and build on the knowledge, skills, and technologies that our ancestors have discovered and created. We stand on the shoulders of giants, so to speak. Our ancestors did not have the means to explore the universe, cure diseases, communicate instantaneously with anyone on the planet, or share knowledge and experiences with billions of others. We do. Our ancestors did not have the luxury of leisure, education, and entertainment that many people enjoy today. We do.
Moreover, some experts argue that human intelligence is not a fixed or measurable trait, but a dynamic and context-dependent phenomenon. Humans, as social and cultural beings, are shaped by their interaction with the world and with each other. What counts as smart in one era or culture may not be so in another. Some people might argue that memorizing long poems or performing complex rituals is a sign of intelligence, while others might see it as a waste of time and energy. Some people might argue that creating powerful machines or devising new algorithms is a sign of intelligence, while others might see it as a threat to human dignity and autonomy.
In other words, the debate over whether our ancestors were smarter than us or not is not only a matter of empirical data or objective assessment. It is also a matter of values, beliefs, and perspectives. What do we mean by smarter? What criteria do we use to measure it? What assumptions do we make about human nature and purpose?
In conclusion, we can say that the question of whether our ancestors were smarter than us is both fascinating and complex. It challenges us to rethink our assumptions about human intelligence, creativity, and progress. It also reminds us of the richness and diversity of human experience, and the importance of learning from the past while striving for a better future. Thank you for listening, and we hope you have enjoyed our podcast.